skooterN2767K wrote:
I don't understand. If the 109 IS so difficult on pavement, why are they flying the impossible taildragger on paved runways? (including Eichorn who apparently won't unless only as a "last resort") Thats all I'm saying. I DON'T believe it's a bad as it's made out to be. Eichorn was even flying the Buchon off pavement at Hahnweide 2010 and I remember seeing at least 1 Buchon at Duxford using the pavement when all the Spits were landing in the grass....he didn't groundloop either. I've also seen countless videos of Mark Hanna flying the Buchon off pavement. He never groundlooped it as far as I know. If the stats are right one would expect a groundloop and total loss of the aircraft every 3rd landing right? I think of the 109 as the Gee Bee. As the years go by the stories get progressivly worse and blown out of proportion. The gear on the late G models as well as the K was upgraded as weights increased just like the spit. The 109T was designed for carrier use as well.
For almost all flying today is on runways. there isn't an alternative.
In the late 80s at POF there was months of effort to return Bubba Beal's HA back to flight status. We put a 3 blade prop on, A-26 Spinner and reconfigured the cowling to make it present more like a 109. It was better looking by far than most of the Merlin powered ones around. Steve Hinton replaced the original brakes with a modified P-51 set up to give it better brakes.
It was flown for the opening of the annual POF Airshow at Chino that year. Really cool formation of a P-51D, Spit Mk XIV, Zero and the 109 look a like. After all that effort I don't believe it was flown again until the filming of Pearl Harbor. The experienced Warbird pilots really didn't like it. It sat for many years on display. Another restorer up in Calif spent years rebuilding one as his passion. He flew for a very short period of time, Had others fly it for him and then sold it to Europe.
I don't believe anyone is suggesting every third flight is the odds. Just that every one flying has had at least one landing accident. And most accidents didn't total the aircraft. But the gear mount is the weak link and easy to tweak or crack.
Jim talks of getting one every now and again. Really not looking forward to that in the hangar. I've seen the 2 seater down in TX. Extra ugly or Fuggly in my opinion.
This is one of those types that is to each his own. Different strokes for different folks. But it isn't for the faint of heart and won't be a real easy flying warbird to operate from what I've experienced.