This is the place where the majority of the warbird (aircraft that have survived military service) discussions will take place. Specialized forums may be added in the new future
Post a reply

Vlado's new rating

Sun Aug 11, 2013 9:45 pm

4 days ago (I'm gettin' sluggish :( )

Congrats Vlado!

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Warbird- ... =2&theater

Re: Vlado's new rating

Mon Aug 12, 2013 7:50 am

:drink3: Congrats!
Robbie

Re: Vlado's new rating

Mon Aug 12, 2013 3:16 pm

Congrats Vlado...

Re: Vlado's new rating

Mon Aug 12, 2013 5:37 pm

Congratulations, Vlado! :supz:

:heart: :heart: :heart: :heart: :heart:
SKYRAIDERS!!!
:heart: :heart: :heart: :heart: :heart:

Re: Vlado's new rating

Mon Aug 12, 2013 6:12 pm

Very Cool! Congrats!! :drink3:

Re: Vlado's new rating

Mon Aug 12, 2013 7:21 pm

And another! :drink3:

Re: Vlado's new rating

Mon Aug 12, 2013 7:24 pm

Anyone care to elaborate for those of us without Facebook?

Re: Vlado's new rating

Mon Aug 12, 2013 7:52 pm

Vlado received his Skyraider type rating.

Craig

Re: Vlado's new rating

Mon Aug 12, 2013 8:28 pm

Most people get heavier as they get older, Vlado just flies heavier planes.........
Fighter pilot to bomber pilot ? you feeling ok ?

Re: Vlado's new rating

Mon Aug 12, 2013 8:45 pm

... attack pilot ...

On a serious note, a buddy who has a fair amount of P-51 & A-1 time says that the A-1 is actually more enjoyable to fly; hydraulically boosted controls, etc. He also admits that a T-28 will beat a Mustang down low and that the Thunder Mustang out-performs the real thing down low as well, but that's another story.

The Mustang will frequently win with cool factor, but I'd rather be a Skyraider guy when I drink enough milk and grow up. I don't know how the AD-1 might differ systems-wise from the later models, but I hope that Vlado chimes in and shares with us his impressions (compare/contrast) of flying the beast.

Ken

Re: Vlado's new rating

Tue Aug 13, 2013 2:29 am

Ken wrote:.....He also admits that a T-28 will beat a Mustang down low and that the Thunder Mustang out-performs the real thing down low as well..........

Which doesn't explain why a modified T-28 with a more powerful engine is still much slower than even an unmodified, stock P-51 at Reno. And Thunder Mustang lap speeds are again slower than those of a stock P-51.

Re: Vlado's new rating

Tue Aug 13, 2013 4:22 am

Amazing to climb aboard such a large, single seat aircraft.
Strong engine. Very easy controls. Lots of mass inertia....most noticeable in formation flying.....takes a bit of power to move into position.
Very simple cockpit and controls.
With weapons on wings, cruise speed is 180 knots.
VL

Re: Vlado's new rating

Tue Aug 13, 2013 7:01 am

Mike wrote:
Ken wrote:.....He also admits that a T-28 will beat a Mustang down low and that the Thunder Mustang out-performs the real thing down low as well..........

Which doesn't explain why a modified T-28 with a more powerful engine is still much slower than even an unmodified, stock P-51 at Reno. And Thunder Mustang lap speeds are again slower than those of a stock P-51.


I should have clarified; not overall speed, but general handling, stick forces, turning, climb rate, and pilot enjoyment factor.

Ken

Re: Vlado's new rating

Tue Aug 13, 2013 8:28 am

Ken wrote:I should have clarified; not overall speed, but general handling, stick forces, turning, climb rate, and pilot enjoyment factor.

Ken

Then perhaps he should have bought a Chipmunk! :)
Post a reply