Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Fri Jun 20, 2025 5:26 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 95 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Dec 31, 2014 11:48 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 19, 2011 11:18 am
Posts: 1574
Location: Northwest Ohio
Well at least there are salvageable parts/pieces that could be utilized in other projects.

_________________
A&P/I.A., A.A.S./Aviation Maintenance technology
Warbird salvage/recovery
One day I'll get that P-40!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 31, 2014 12:02 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2009 5:28 am
Posts: 2008
Location: massachusetts
Well my whole idea and most practical aircraft to help would be a c-47. That could at least take the props and smaller things out. As for the biggest pieces I would look at where the fort was assembled when built. Even if rivets needed to be bucked to break the plane up, I would do that for the safety of the team and ensure the plane a safe trip. Don't get me wrong on any level here. What's these guys did was an amazing effort guided by guts and will power.

If a fire broke out while taxing, imagine what could of happened in the air over that type of territory

_________________
" I am a nobody in aviation, but somebody to my family."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 31, 2014 12:43 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 12:57 pm
Posts: 1263
Location: Lacombe, Alberta, Canada
Since Kee Bird is clearly finished and is likely to remain where it is forever, not to mention it still being a bit of an open wound for many people, I'd like to toss this semi hypothetical exercise out there: Avro Lancaster KB999 ditched in a freshwater lake at approx N61 14 W95 29 in 1952. It looked like this:

http://www.lancaster-archive.com/lanc_surv_kb999.htm

(It doesn't look like that anymore, btw but for the purpose of this exercise it does.) Your goal is to get it to Winnipeg, Manitoba. We'll say there's 2500' feet of suitably firm beach available, or in the winter 6ooo' of ice, and it's in the same approx condition as the B-29 was.

So how would you go about salvaging it?

_________________
Defending Stearmans on WIX since Jeff started badmouthing them back in 2005.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 31, 2014 12:48 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2009 5:28 am
Posts: 2008
Location: massachusetts
At all costs, disassemble the plane and ship it to where a top to bottom restoration could be done. You would need a barge to start....

_________________
" I am a nobody in aviation, but somebody to my family."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 31, 2014 12:49 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2009 5:28 am
Posts: 2008
Location: massachusetts
Oh, I never found out if the b-29 in the condition it was currently, take off in 2,000 feet of runway?

_________________
" I am a nobody in aviation, but somebody to my family."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 31, 2014 1:06 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2006 5:11 pm
Posts: 1111
Location: Outer Space
Digger wrote:
Taken within the last 6 months I believe. Clearly shows what's left at the site.

http://vimeo.com/106871067




I don't fault the guys a bit for trying to get the Kee Bird out of there. But it's just so sad to see that video. :(


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 31, 2014 2:14 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 19, 2011 11:18 am
Posts: 1574
Location: Northwest Ohio
Dan Jones wrote:
Since Kee Bird is clearly finished and is likely to remain where it is forever, not to mention it still being a bit of an open wound for many people, I'd like to toss this semi hypothetical exercise out there: Avro Lancaster KB999 ditched in a freshwater lake at approx N61 14 W95 29 in 1952. It looked like this:

http://www.lancaster-archive.com/lanc_surv_kb999.htm

(It doesn't look like that anymore, btw but for the purpose of this exercise it does.) Your goal is to get it to Winnipeg, Manitoba. We'll say there's 2500' feet of suitably firm beach available, or in the winter 6ooo' of ice, and it's in the same approx condition as the B-29 was.

So how would you go about salvaging it?



Use flotation devices to get it off of the bottom and tow it towards the shoreline where it could be dismantled a bit easier. Of course everything is easier said than done!

_________________
A&P/I.A., A.A.S./Aviation Maintenance technology
Warbird salvage/recovery
One day I'll get that P-40!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 31, 2014 2:36 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2011 5:37 pm
Posts: 1380
Dan Jones wrote:
Since Kee Bird is clearly finished and is likely to remain where it is forever, not to mention it still being a bit of an open wound for many people, I'd like to toss this semi hypothetical exercise out there: Avro Lancaster KB999 ditched in a freshwater lake at approx N61 14 W95 29 in 1952. It looked like this:

http://www.lancaster-archive.com/lanc_surv_kb999.htm

(It doesn't look like that anymore, btw but for the purpose of this exercise it does.) Your goal is to get it to Winnipeg, Manitoba. We'll say there's 2500' feet of suitably firm beach available, or in the winter 6ooo' of ice, and it's in the same approx condition as the B-29 was.

So how would you go about salvaging it?


Sounds like you have that one located?

Using your lat/long, that is about 48 miles from Arviat. They have a float plane base as well as a runway. Plus they have an ATV/snowmobile trail that runs out towards that lat/long. I'd bet the locals know a trail to it. Anyway....got to get the plane to Arviat and/or eventually to Churchill. Once in Churchill you can take the ice road down to Hwy 280. If doing this in the summer....who has a DC-3 on floats or a stout helo for sling ops to Arviat? If winter...who has a DC-3 or bigger on skis? I also see Calm Air flies into Arviat and has a Hawker Siddeley 748 cargo/charter. I wouldn't be surprised if they can install some skis on it. If using them, just get the Lancaster to Churchill and take the ice road/280/6 to Winnipeg or put it on the Hudson railway and move it that way. Another option is get it to Arviat and then barge it to Churchill for the ice road or Hudson railway.

I bet the skeeters/flies are severely vicious out on the tundra in the spring/summer. I was in Kuujjuaq caribou hunting once in Sept and there were a few around. Been bear hunting in the Duck Mountains in MB too. Beautiful country.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 31, 2014 3:06 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 8:39 am
Posts: 120
Digger wrote:
Taken within the last 6 months I believe. Clearly shows what's left at the site.

http://vimeo.com/106871067

or google Kee Bird video within 2012 to 2014


It looks like the plane experienced some post-fire damage as well. Props are bent and the back of the wing is smashed in like it was pushed with a bulldozer? Hopefully somebody would be able to save whats left someday, there are bound to be some useful parts left.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 31, 2014 5:35 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 2:02 am
Posts: 4701
Location: Yucca Valley, CA
Jeremy S wrote:
It looks like the plane experienced some post-fire damage as well. Props are bent and the back of the wing is smashed in like it was pushed with a bulldozer? Hopefully somebody would be able to save whats left someday, there are bound to be some useful parts left.

Not sure about the bent props but at some point the wind caught the tail and blew it into and over the wing.

As far as useful parts, well... there are supposedly enough ex-China Lake components out at Aero Trader to build one last potential flyer, but I haven't heard of anyone beating down their doors to buy them. The folks restoring Doc could have used the Kee Bird's (then) intact fin and rudder, but one was available here, so...

_________________
Image
All right, Mister Dorfmann, start pullin'!
Pilot: "Flap switch works hard in down position."
Mechanic: "Flap switch checked OK. Pilot needs more P.T." - Flight report, TB-17G 42-102875 (Hobbs AAF)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 31, 2014 6:31 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2011 5:37 pm
Posts: 1380
Here's the 50 cent question. "If" the Kee Bird remains were to be brought back to the U.S. by a new group, would previous salvagers have any claim to the parts/pieces?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 31, 2014 7:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 6:38 am
Posts: 385
Location: Adelaide
CoastieJohn wrote:
Here's the 50 cent question. "If" the Kee Bird remains were to be brought back to the U.S. by a new group, would previous salvagers have any claim to the parts/pieces?


International salvage laws say no they wouldn't but because this occurred on sovereign soil I would suspect some difficulties with the Government. Perhaps an environmental clean up of the site would be the best aproach

_________________
Peter
ESAD (E-Science and Digitalisation)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 31, 2014 7:29 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 19, 2011 11:18 am
Posts: 1574
Location: Northwest Ohio
Digger wrote:
CoastieJohn wrote:
Here's the 50 cent question. "If" the Kee Bird remains were to be brought back to the U.S. by a new group, would previous salvagers have any claim to the parts/pieces?


International salvage laws say no they wouldn't but because this occurred on sovereign soil I would suspect some difficulties with the Government. Perhaps an environmental clean up of the site would be the best aproach


Depends on how long the salvage permits were good for, but after this much time has elapsed I'm sure if someone wanted to salvage what's left the Greenland government would issue new permits. From my own experience having an environmental cleanup plan in place is needed before permits are issued. For example; even if an aircraft has been submerged for 60 years there still may be fluids inside and once disturbed could leak out. If memory serves correct Larkin's had to do a cleanup of the area before they'd issue him any further permits ( empty barrels, half sunk dozer, and what ever else was left at the site).
I also thought the engines and props had been removed but with the video link above clearly shows them in place.

_________________
A&P/I.A., A.A.S./Aviation Maintenance technology
Warbird salvage/recovery
One day I'll get that P-40!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 31, 2014 8:23 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2011 5:37 pm
Posts: 1380
cooper9411 wrote:
Digger wrote:
CoastieJohn wrote:
Here's the 50 cent question. "If" the Kee Bird remains were to be brought back to the U.S. by a new group, would previous salvagers have any claim to the parts/pieces?


International salvage laws say no they wouldn't but because this occurred on sovereign soil I would suspect some difficulties with the Government. Perhaps an environmental clean up of the site would be the best aproach


Depends on how long the salvage permits were good for, but after this much time has elapsed I'm sure if someone wanted to salvage what's left the Greenland government would issue new permits. From my own experience having an environmental cleanup plan in place is needed before permits are issued. For example; even if an aircraft has been submerged for 60 years there still may be fluids inside and once disturbed could leak out. If memory serves correct Larkin's had to do a cleanup of the area before they'd issue him any further permits ( empty barrels, half sunk dozer, and what ever else was left at the site).
I also thought the engines and props had been removed but with the video link above clearly shows them in place.


I was thinking about previous U.S. salvagers trying to initiate a claim of the parts/pieces when they hit U.S. soil. I can see a dog fight for the engines and other high value parts once they hit the states. The question is do those previous salvagers have a legit claim to those/parts/pieces?

As it was explained to me by someone close to the events and as I loosely recall how it was told to me, those who "took over" the project were supposed to assume responsibility for everything, including clean-ups. Unfortunately for Gary, the names on the permits were not transferred over like they were supposed to be. So....he was left holding the clean-up bag. If anyone sees I got it wrong please set the record straight.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 31, 2014 10:06 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 19, 2011 11:18 am
Posts: 1574
Location: Northwest Ohio
Its possible for previous salvagers to try to stake a claim in court but after this length of time the parts/pieces would be considered formally abandoned. If Greenland issues permits those permits would be for parts/pieces at the scene providing they are/once were attached to said aircraft. The costs of involving the courts would not only be expensive but time consuming and ultimately in the end the persons initiating the courts involvement wouldn't be pleased with the outcome.

_________________
A&P/I.A., A.A.S./Aviation Maintenance technology
Warbird salvage/recovery
One day I'll get that P-40!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 95 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 274 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group