Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Tue Jun 17, 2025 7:44 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 39 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Jul 07, 2017 6:32 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2014 4:19 pm
Posts: 1594
TBDude wrote:
This more properly belongs under "Vintage Aviation"


Seriously? Do we not have a Sci-Fi section on WIX?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 07, 2017 7:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 1:14 pm
Posts: 669
Location: Aerodrome of Democracy
quemerford wrote:
TBDude wrote:
This more properly belongs under "Vintage Aviation"


Seriously? Do we not have a Sci-Fi section on WIX?


I agree this type of topic really does not need to be a part of WIX
The Earhart topic just brings out all the Kooks and their ridiculous theories that are nothing more than hearsay .....shoe heals , cold crème jars, turtle bones , underwater images that look nothing like an airplane , military patrols that claim to have data plates but are conveniently lost , phantom signals, Japanese capture yada, yada, yada . This is National Enquirer crap

_________________
...it was a plane adrift beneath the moon moving serenely thru beams like an angel of the night .....fair as a song ........aloof from mortal dreams


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 07, 2017 7:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 4:21 pm
Posts: 560
Location: Madison, WI
But I'm sure the next photo in the archive is from the German castle with a basement full of DO-335's!

_________________
Chris


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 07, 2017 9:12 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Thu May 27, 2004 8:06 pm
Posts: 1662
Location: Baltimore MD
I just want to hear "the most interesting man in the world's" take on this before the thread goes away. Stay thirsty, my friends....

Here is a link to the real story. It even has an appropriate photo....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r_SAKcOuTpU

_________________
REMEMBER THE SERGEANT PILOTS!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 07, 2017 12:46 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2011 5:37 pm
Posts: 1380
This will be interesting to see how the History Channel responds.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/amelia-earha ... 43661.html

Amelia Earhart Documentary Is Fake, Claims Expert
[International Business Times]
Dory Jackson
,International Business Times•July 5, 2017

An upcoming documentary airing Sunday on the History Channel titled "Amelia Earhart: The Lost Evidence" planned to rewrite history by shedding light on Amelia Earheart's mysterious disappearance, but an expert on Eartheart claimed on Wednesday that the documentary is a fraud, according to TMZ.

Ric Gillespie, the owner of The International Group For Historic Aircraft Recovery (TIGHAR), an organization that investigates Earheart's disappearance, claims the famed aviator isn't present with her navigator Fred Noonan in a blurry photo that the documentary believes to be real.

While there are many theories that have emerged regarding Earheart's disappearance, Gillespie and TIGHAR don't stand behind this one.

Gillespie, who has known about the photograph that the History Channel reveals it evaluated for about a year in the upcoming documentary, told TMZ that "there were a lot of mercenaries in that area at the time ... so it could be any white woman in the pic — the features aren't recognizable."

The Earhart expert claims that "she would not have had enough fuel to get to the Marshall Islands, where the photo was allegedly taken," primarily because her final signal was discovered roughly 100 miles from that location.

It's worth noting that the photo also doesn't match smoothly with the documentary's captive theory. Gillespie clarified that "none of the alleged captors [in the photo] have guns or look threatening." Two Caucasians pictured appear to be engaging in casual activity, hanging freely on a pier at the Marshall Islands.

Nonetheless, Gillespie and fellow members of TIGHAR continue to stand behind their initial theory, which is that Earhart survived the 1937 airplane crash and died as a castaway on Nikumaroro, Kiribati, an island located in the western Pacific Ocean.

The photograph at hand was discovered in the National Archives by Les Kinney, a former United States Treasury Agent. It was released ahead of the documentary, which is slated for a July 9 premiere, as a promotional tool to spark interest amongst potential viewers. The alleged photo shows a woman and a man, who is presumed to be Earheart and Noonan, surrounded by a group of island natives on a dock in the Marshall Islands.

"If you look at her, you look at the body, the build, the short hair, the fact that she's a Caucasian and when you look at this individual over here, this taller man is Caucasian. Fred Noonan, Earhart's navigator," Kinney said in the documentary.

According to People, Former FBI Assistant Director Shawn Henry claims in the documentary that "we got a straight answer from the government" on her disappearance, an event for which he believes "someone went to great lengths to make sure the world never knew the real story."

Whether The History Channel or TIGHAR's theories on Earheart's disappearance are accurate are to be determined. However, TIGHAR has had previous success in unearthing pertinent evidence regarding the 1937 incident, including bone fragments that were found several months after the organization's 2012 expedition. Reportedly, they could remnants of Earhart's body.

Image

Amelia Earhart, pictured June 14, 1928 in front of her bi-plane called 'Friendship,' an expert on Earthart's disappearance claims the History Channel's new documentary on her is fake.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 07, 2017 1:58 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 7:31 pm
Posts: 1120
Location: Caribou, Maine
quemerford said:

Quote:
And apologies for being a bit tetchy but empty fuel tanks are not buoyancy aids: they have an open feed end and an open vent end which will let the water in (as they have done on many, many occasions): there is no reason for the Earhart/Noonan aircraft to float any more than any other aircraft which runs out of fuel and ditches.


I agree with quemerford's comments, and thank him for kind words. I also shake my head about assumptions concerning buoyancy and an intact aircraft at the bottom of the ocean. Those who support the 'crashed and sank' hypothesis generally think that AE would have been at maybe 1000' altitude when she ran out of fuel. She was not as well experienced a pilot as many assume, and particularly after such a long/stressful flight, may well not have been able to dead-stick to a ditch-landing. I think a crash was more likely, which would mean disarticulated aircraft remains at the bottom of the Pacific.

I wonder what assumptions have been made by those who have looked for her on the ocean bottom. Are they looking for an intact aircraft? Are they looking for and can they adequately resolve aircraft fragments?

I am also curious about the 38' estimate for the aircraft length from the blurry image on the single photo. This can be roughly estimated if the length of the cargo ship is known, but my guess is that the ship and its dimensions are unknown, or from a stereopair of photos, but that also does not seem to be the case. Also, the aircraft (if this is indeed an aircraft) does not appear to be oriented the same way as the ship, which would complicate measurement. From my experience, anyone who would state such a value on such evidence HAS NO CREDIBILITY WHATSOEVER: someone with experience would state +/- on the value to show the level of uncertainty.

_________________
Kevin McCartney


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 08, 2017 10:10 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Fri May 25, 2007 4:50 pm
Posts: 1028
Quote:
Whether The History Channel or TIGHAR's theories on Earheart's disappearance are accurate are to be determined. However, TIGHAR has had previous success in unearthing pertinent evidence regarding the 1937 incident, including bone fragments that were found several months after the organization's 2012 expedition. Reportedly, they could remnants of Earhart's body.


It's hard to stop laughing.

_________________
Always looking for WW2 Half-Tracks and Parts.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 08, 2017 12:43 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2014 4:19 pm
Posts: 1594
PinecastleAAF wrote:
Quote:
Whether The History Channel or TIGHAR's theories on Earheart's disappearance are accurate are to be determined. However, TIGHAR has had previous success in unearthing pertinent evidence regarding the 1937 incident, including bone fragments that were found several months after the organization's 2012 expedition. Reportedly, they could remnants of Earhart's body.


It's hard to stop laughing.


True, but I am finding it more difficult...

This whole non-story relies purely on conjecture posing as fact, and lots of things that are difficult to disprove: jars of cream that could have belonged to AH (but equally could have belonged to Adolf Hitler because he was "reportedly" keen on cross-dressing - go on prove he wasn't!), bone fragments which could have been from AH's skeleton (but equally could have come from anyone else who has died in the Pacific) and so on. The key point is that it's always a case of "prove they didn't", which is a difficult argument to win, even when presented with childishly naive 'interpretations' of an old photograph. Same with that supposed metallic part found some time ago, which could have come from AH's Lockheed, but equally could have come from pretty much anything else.

And I cannot believe I've just wasted 5 minutes of my life writing this!!!

Time for a :drink3:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 08, 2017 5:56 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:27 am
Posts: 5612
Location: Eastern Washington
Wow! A story that uses the word fraud and mentions TIGHAR but doesn't use the word in relation to the group!

A first!!!! :) :) :)

_________________
Remember the vets, the wonderful planes they flew and their sacrifices for a future many of them did not live to see.
Note political free signature.
I figure if you wanted my opinion on items unrelated to this forum, you'd ask for it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 09, 2017 10:31 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 10:16 am
Posts: 2308
JFS61 wrote:
Is there one good website that concisely and clearly presents the case against Tighar and its evidence?

The only factual *evidence* I've seen from TIGHAR is that the Pacific is pretty big, very wet & dotted with islands.

I just watched about 40 minutes of the farce/show. Don't waste your time.

_________________
Those who possess real knowledge are rare.

Those who can set that knowledge into motion in the physical world are rarer still.

The few who possess real knowledge and can set it into motion of their own hands are the rarest of all.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 09, 2017 11:50 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2006 3:31 am
Posts: 309
Entertainment! :P


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2017 7:24 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 2:02 am
Posts: 4701
Location: Yucca Valley, CA
Or, if you weren't entertained, call it "irritainment"! Image

_________________
Image
All right, Mister Dorfmann, start pullin'!
Pilot: "Flap switch works hard in down position."
Mechanic: "Flap switch checked OK. Pilot needs more P.T." - Flight report, TB-17G 42-102875 (Hobbs AAF)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 11, 2017 5:14 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 3:49 pm
Posts: 126
Location: Germany
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/201 ... r-by-japan


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 11, 2017 7:50 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 7:13 pm
Posts: 5664
Location: Minnesota, USA
James D wrote:
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/jul/11/blogger-discredits-claim-amelia-earhart-was-taken-prisoner-by-japan



For the truly curious/bored, the pic is found on page 44 of this 1935 Japanese travelogue:

http://dl.ndl.go.jp/info:ndljp/pid/1223403

_________________
It was a good idea, it just didn't work.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 11, 2017 8:48 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club

Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 9:33 pm
Posts: 4707
Location: refugee in Pasa-GD-dena, Texas
Page 99 Dan. Thanks for the link! Like the torpedo down the throat of the Death Star, that kills that story!
EDIT
I didn't watch the History Channel show. Too much hubbub with too little info with a healthy dose of wild speculation. Hopefully it won't see the airwaves again. But, that does leave an opening for a new HC documentary about the Gubmint plot to discredit the "True Story" about Amelia Earhart. pop2

_________________
He bowls overhand...He is the most interesting man in the world.
"In Peace Japan Breeds War", Eckstein, Harper and Bros., 3rd ed. 1943(1927, 1928,1942)
"Leave it to ol' Slim. I got ideas...and they're all vile, baby." South Dakota Slim
"Ahh..."The Deuce", 28,000 pounds of motherly love." quote from some Mojave Grunt
DBF


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 39 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 252 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group