Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Sun Jun 22, 2025 1:17 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 57 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Apr 08, 2019 10:51 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2004 2:38 pm
Posts: 2662
Location: Nashville, Tennessee
I heard from Nelson Ezell himself (10 years ago)that the former Pruitt P-38 was a truly awful candidate for restoration. He said a better choice would be a South Pacific veteran of which there are some airframes. He said the Pruitt airframe is worse than “The Scatterbrained Kid “ P-38.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 09, 2019 4:17 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 3:49 pm
Posts: 126
Location: Germany
Not seen or heard anything about the Focke-Wulf 189 in a very long time. Makes me wonder if work has been progressing under wraps, as with the Stuka.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 09, 2019 7:25 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 04, 2004 8:54 am
Posts: 3331
The Fw189 is making steady progress.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 09, 2019 8:05 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 3:49 pm
Posts: 126
Location: Germany
Mike wrote:
The Fw189 is making steady progress.


Excellent news Mike. Don't suppose you'd have any idea when we might expect to see it completed?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 09, 2019 11:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 3:57 pm
Posts: 283
Location: Houston, TX
marine air wrote:
I heard from Nelson Ezell himself (10 years ago)that the former Pruitt P-38 was a truly awful candidate for restoration. He said a better choice would be a South Pacific veteran of which there are some airframes. He said the Pruitt airframe is worse than “The Scatterbrained Kid “ P-38.

Speaking of The Scatterbrain Kid, what is its disposition? Last time I saw it (many, many years ago) it was still in San Marcos in a pile.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 09, 2019 1:15 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:48 pm
Posts: 7821
Quote:
So the XP-82 is finished... what’s next?!

Rumored to be the "Red Bull" logo's and the mirror polish. That's what's next ... lol

_________________
Zero Surprise!!...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 09, 2019 2:55 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 04, 2004 8:54 am
Posts: 3331
maradamx3 wrote:
Speaking of The Scatterbrain Kid, what is its disposition? Last time I saw it (many, many years ago) it was still in San Marcos in a pile.

Under restoration for FHCAM, recently moved from Wespac to Ezell's


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2019 3:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 10:22 pm
Posts: 112
Location: Spokane, WA
The project that I've only heard murmurs about that would eclipse even the XP-82 would be a Boeing 314. I've heard several people mention it in passing as "the ultimate project" and there is at least one group who as put the recovery of one as a goal. To see one restored or replicated would be unparalleled in my opinion.

https://www.panam.org/pan-am-stories/627-the-saga-of-the-sunken-clipper

_________________
Ryan Pemberton
www.pembertonandsons.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2019 4:45 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:27 am
Posts: 5614
Location: Eastern Washington
The 314 would be great, but one wonders how realistic a recovery would be?
it would likely end up a 99% new build....and one has to wonder if Boeing, leery of liability*, would go along?

*Based on the reports that the P-26 replica for the NMUSAF had to use non-aircraft structure quality tubing, despite the fact the Museum doesn't fly its aircraft and the reported denial of a restorer to access factory drawings in the rebuild of a rare civil biplane.

We occasionally hear reports that someone is building a replica of the Titanic, based on that, one wonders if they'll ever build a replica Hindenburg or Graf Zepplin. Even though g it was built of modern materials, it would be great to see a large full scale rigid airship.

And almost as daunting, wasn't someone in the U.S. building a Gotha or some other WWI bomber? It would be neat to see a U.S. 1920s bomber...A Keystone or something similar. But since many/most used Curtiss engines...which are pretty much extinct in airworthy shape, that's probably not going to happen.

_________________
Remember the vets, the wonderful planes they flew and their sacrifices for a future many of them did not live to see.
Note political free signature.
I figure if you wanted my opinion on items unrelated to this forum, you'd ask for it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2019 5:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2010 11:44 am
Posts: 847
Location: DAL glidepath
JohnB wrote:
The 314 would be great, but one wonders how realistic a recovery would be?
it would likely end up a 99% new build....and one has to wonder if Boeing, leery of liability*, would go along?

*Based on the reports that the P-26 replica for the NMUSAF had to use non-aircraft structure quality tubing, despite the fact the Museum doesn't fly its aircraft and the reported denial of a restorer to access factory drawings in the rebuild of a rare civil biplane.

We occasionally hear reports that someone is building a replica of the Titanic, based on that, one wonders if they'll ever build a replica Hindenburg or Graf Zepplin. Even though g it was built of modern materials, it would be great to see a large full scale rigid airship.

And almost as daunting, wasn't someone in the U.S. building a Gotha or some other WWI bomber? It would be neat to see a U.S. 1920s bomber...A Keystone or something similar. But since many/most used Curtiss engines...which are pretty much extinct in airworthy shape, that's probably not going to happen.


I've often wondered why no Keystone has been done (aside from money...obvious). They occupied a unique place in American military aviation history, but besides some tail feathers at Barksdale or at the NMUSAF, there doesn't seem to be much left.

What would it take to make one go? Seems like they were tube and fabric, so materials couldn't be too difficult to obtain. Anyhow, just musing hoping that someone who does more hand to wrench or basic bean counting on these projects might opine.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2019 8:02 pm 
Offline
KiwiZac
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2008 12:33 am
Posts: 1467
Location: Blenheim, NZ
I figured the FHCAM Stuka was the next big thing. No example's flown for many, many decades, it's practically an icon of WW2 history known even to the public, and this example (or at least the ID it's using from the three source wrecks) has documented combat history.

JohnB wrote:
And almost as daunting, wasn't someone in the U.S. building a Gotha or some other WWI bomber?

I think his name was Ron Bloomquist, a complete-looking Gotha fuselage appeared in Classic Wings around 2004 but I seem to remember it got broken down and hasn't been underway for some time.

_________________
Zac in NZ
#avgeek, modelbuilder, photographer, writer. Callsign: "HANDBAG".
https://linktr.ee/zacyates

"It's his plane, he spent the money to restore it, he can do with it what he wants. I will never understand what's hard to comprehend about this." - kalamazookid, 20/08/2013
"The more time you spend around warbirds the sooner you learn nothing, is simple." - JohnB, 24/02/22


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2019 8:16 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 3:02 pm
Posts: 302
Per Horace Brock, who flew both the Keystone and the B-314, the Keystone was a terrible performer that could barely stay in the air. That's paraphrased from his book "Flying The Oceans"; he was an Army bomber pilot before joining Pan Am. And since the type had no combat career, and no heroic deeds to remember, I can't imagine that there's much interest in it.
And even if it were possible to resurrect a 314, it would have to be a static display, like the Vought-Sikorsky VS-44 in New England. What museum has a flying boat ramp? And how could you put it on tour? So I doubt that the cubic dollars needed to bring back either type, no matter how worthy, will ever be found. A pity, because the Boeing Clipper has an important history, and it's always been one of my favorites.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2019 8:38 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 5:31 pm
Posts: 1352
Location: Galveston County
I'm surprised the P-61 isn't getting more love. For my money it's more of a showstopper than a Twin Mustang, even if I believe a P-82 would beat the thunder out of a 'Widow when it comes to airshow draw.

_________________
Cheers,
Kurt Maurer
League City, Texas

PIC, Ford 6600 pulling Rhino batwing up and down the runway


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2019 9:14 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2006 7:18 pm
Posts: 2050
Location: Meriden,Ct.
+1 :drink3:

Phil

_________________
A man's got to know his limitations.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 16, 2019 7:25 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:27 am
Posts: 5614
Location: Eastern Washington
Pogo wrote:
I'm surprised the P-61 isn't getting more love.


Nothing against the P-61, I like them and am eagerly awaiting the one under restoration to be completed...
but...
Say you're at a party and someone heard of your interest in WWII aviation and asks you your favorite (or even half dozen) American fighters of the war, most of the time, a P-61 won't be on the tip of your tongue.
Yes, it's a neat plane, but largely unheralded.

_________________
Remember the vets, the wonderful planes they flew and their sacrifices for a future many of them did not live to see.
Note political free signature.
I figure if you wanted my opinion on items unrelated to this forum, you'd ask for it.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 57 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 73 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group