Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Thu Jul 03, 2025 1:52 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Sep 15, 2006 3:53 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 8:43 am
Posts: 505
Location: Australia
Rumours are gathering that the Lancaster i think the UK rego one is flying to NZ via Oz in 2007 for the film dambusters...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 15, 2006 3:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 25, 2005 11:57 pm
Posts: 223
Location: Planet Earth
Pfffftttt.

'The UK one' isn't a 'reggo' aircraft as it belongs to and is operated by the RAF as a commemorative aircraft; it's still a military machine: PA474, no civil registration.

_________________
Raven


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: never happen
PostPosted: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:08 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 10:14 am
Posts: 1694
Location: canada
Wishful thinking but why fly all the way there when they can film her here? Read on the net that is the reason that Just jane is doing a highspeed run again

_________________
Cheers,
Peter

________


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 15, 2006 10:03 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 9:42 pm
Posts: 2708
Location: NP, NJ, USA
Just a few questions to counter the rumors...

Why would you take a Lanc and fly it half way across the globe to Oz...when the Lanc was actually based in England? :confused:

So by having the Lanc in England, you have the correct plane and location... :?:

_________________
Share your story: Rutgers Oral History Archive http://oralhistory.rutgers.edu/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 15, 2006 10:31 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 1:08 pm
Posts: 2993
Location: Bunker Hill, WV
Well...on the other hand, ya' gotta' ask yourself, "Just how much clout does Peter Jackson have?"
Were it me, I'd try to get the Canadian Lanc to fly to the UK for filming.

Mudge the logical :?

_________________
Land of the free because of the brave


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 15, 2006 12:13 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 6:27 am
Posts: 257
Location: Schiedam, NL
They could have multiple reasons for flying it to NZ if true...
Might be reasons:
- The weather is better there. It's expensive to have a film crew sitting around waiting for good weather.
- Low flying is better there because there are less people around. And the landscape of Europe might have changed too much to represent 1943.

On the other hand I hope they will film at RAF Scampton too. I've been there 2 years ago and as far as I know it's still looking a lot like it was during the war. Except for the new control tower and extended runway.
It would spoil the movie if you would be watching and thinking “Hey, that’s not RAF Scampton!?”.

_________________
http://www.warbird-hangar.com links and gallery &
http://www.yakkes.com Yakkes Foundation, Yak-52


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: never happen
PostPosted: Fri Sep 15, 2006 12:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2004 7:18 am
Posts: 671
Location: Berkshire, UK
peter wrote:
Wishful thinking but why fly all the way there when they can film her here? Read on the net that is the reason that Just jane is doing a highspeed run again


Very wishful thinking :wink:

I think youre right here Peter, most likely a film crew dispatched to East Kirby to get some film in the can of a running Lanc in a correct location.

Absolutely zilch, zero chance of the RAF BBMF ever using up all that time and flying hours to fly PA474 to NZ for a film...just not going to happen.

BEaring in mind the logistics of trying to get the CWH Lanc over to the UK became a non-starter, I can't even see the Canadian one making the trip, as pressumably it would have to go west across Canada, and then anti-clockwise around the Pacific rim to get there......and back.

Nope....not a chance :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 15, 2006 1:13 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 1:08 pm
Posts: 2993
Location: Bunker Hill, WV
Firebird...Not all that clear about your logistics. Why would a flight from Canada go west to get to the UK? Wouldn't that be the long way by far?

Mudge the geographically challenged :shock:

_________________
Land of the free because of the brave


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 15, 2006 1:24 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 2:10 pm
Posts: 3249
Location: New York
I think by "the trip" he meant the hypothetical trip to NZ.

As another issue besides "logistics" -- aren't we, at this point, past the time when such valuable aircraft are exposed to the hazards of open-ocean flying, except perhaps to effect a permanent relocation and then only as a last resort? I kind of hope so. We all know that there is no amount of insurance that could truly compensate for the loss of a flyable Lanc.

August


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 15, 2006 2:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2004 7:18 am
Posts: 671
Location: Berkshire, UK
k5083 wrote:
I think by "the trip" he meant the hypothetical trip to NZ.


Correct.

That reducing over the water exposure time is why I would assume, if hypothetically the Canadian Lanc were to make the trip to NZ, it would have to go the long way anti-clockwise around the Pacific rim, and back the same way. That's a lot of flying and a lot of planning and advance support logistics.

As I said.....no chance.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 15, 2006 2:55 pm 
Offline
Senior Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2006 12:22 am
Posts: 3875
Location: DFW Texas
So...was the Memphis Belle movie the last time we will see large warbirds making the epic journey across the pond? As I recall that went rather well, at least I don't remember hearing about massive troubles, other than the sad loss of one of the French airplanes during filming.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 15, 2006 3:08 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2005 12:23 am
Posts: 321
http://www.aintitcool.com/node/30076

I don't think they will use either the BBMF Lancaster or the Canadian example - flying scenes are probably all going to be CGI anyway. In the article above Peter Jackson confirms 10 full scale, fiberglass replicas are going to be built which I assume will be for ground/taxi shots.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 15, 2006 4:20 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2004 4:55 pm
Posts: 1105
Location: Australia
Quote:
Absolutely zilch, zero chance of the RAF BBMF ever using up all that time and flying hours to fly PA474 to NZ for a film...just not going to happen.

BEaring in mind the logistics of trying to get the CWH Lanc over to the UK became a non-starter, I can't even see the Canadian one making the trip, as pressumably it would have to go west across Canada, and then anti-clockwise around the Pacific rim to get there......and back.



I think it would be great to have a Lanc fly out, and if there is concerns about chewing up flying hours, just leave it down under and avoid the waste of flying hours taking it back up top! smiles

regards

Mark P

_________________
20th Century - The Age of Manned Flight
"from Wrights to Armstrong in 66 years -WOW!"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 16, 2006 10:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 11:39 pm
Posts: 764
Location: Huntsville, Alabama
Hi,

I too, think that flying one of the airworthy Lancasters all the way down to Australia would be a monumental undrtaking for either the RAF or the CWH. But, it sure would be nice to see both of them in the air together flying....but that is just wishful thinking on my part.

Paul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 16, 2006 10:27 am 
Does anyone here know just how much work it would take to get "Just Jane" airworthy again?

Dan


Top
  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 47 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group