Thu Jun 09, 2011 1:37 pm
sSkyraiderdriver wrote:As a parent, I think I would say something if my kid was playing hopscotch at the Vietnam Wall.
Thu Jun 09, 2011 1:47 pm
muddyboots wrote:whatever kid.
Thu Jun 09, 2011 1:59 pm
Thu Jun 09, 2011 2:10 pm
Thu Jun 09, 2011 2:26 pm
warbird2 wrote:muddyboots wrote:whatever kid.
I am not a kid so I would appreciate it if you would not refer to me as one.
So by your rational, children should be allowed to run around, play and use sidewalk chalk at the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier? What about drawing on the Iwo Jima Memorial? Was it just fine when that girl made the news because she had pictures made while washing her feet in the WWII memorial?
It seems to me that decency is being allowed to die off a little faster everyday. Maybe it does not bother you but it does bother me and hopefully most other people with any respect. If I am misunderstanding you, please feel free to explain it.
Thu Jun 09, 2011 2:28 pm
spookythecat wrote: a nuisance it is.
Thu Jun 09, 2011 2:29 pm
Thu Jun 09, 2011 4:00 pm
muddyboots wrote:warbird2 wrote:muddyboots wrote:whatever kid.
I am not a kid so I would appreciate it if you would not refer to me as one.
So by your rational, children should be allowed to run around, play and use sidewalk chalk at the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier? What about drawing on the Iwo Jima Memorial? Was it just fine when that girl made the news because she had pictures made while washing her feet in the WWII memorial?
It seems to me that decency is being allowed to die off a little faster everyday. Maybe it does not bother you but it does bother me and hopefully most other people with any respect. If I am misunderstanding you, please feel free to explain it.
Kid, I would expect a child to play at the tomb, and have seen children playing at the tomb and not had an issue with it. As for the Iwo Jima Memorial, well, it's a gay hangout, so better a child drawing on the sidewalk beneath it than two gay men having sex beneath it. Which I have seen. I have never heard of a girl washing her feet at the WWII memorial but no, I don't really have a problem with it. It's a memorial, not a gravesite.
Thu Jun 09, 2011 4:06 pm
Thu Jun 09, 2011 4:36 pm
muddyboots wrote:yeah, she doesn't get it. But she's not a child. We were discussing children were we not? What does a twnety something taking a bath in the memorial pool have to do with kids playing with chalk?
Thu Jun 09, 2011 5:28 pm
warbird2 wrote:muddyboots wrote:yeah, she doesn't get it. But she's not a child. We were discussing children were we not? What does a twnety something taking a bath in the memorial pool have to do with kids playing with chalk?
My point was, and still is, disrespect is disrespect. I had no idea how old that girl was, I just remember hearing about it happening.
But that does not matter either way because disrespect starts at an early age and no matter how you market it, the majority of people are going to see anything like this as disprespectful. Swimming in the WWII memorial is just as disrespecful as kicking over headstones at a national cememtery or as disrespectful as painting on someones place of business.
In my mind it is no different than people tresspassing on other people's property for any reason: as was talked about at length in this thread: viewtopic.php?f=3&t=40335
Decency is fast going away and people have less and less respect for other people's memories, monuments and personal property as the days go by. Somebody believed they were free to do whatever they wanted to the Gus Grissom memorial because, like the tresspasser in the other thread, they thought the laws did not apply to them.
I am sure the kids that were drawing on the sidewalk with chalk had no idea that it was disrespectful and I am not quite ready to send them to the chair for it. But I am sure they know now. Their parents knew it was disrespectful. If they did not know, then they should have. The girl playing in the WWII memorial knew, or should have. And the people that spray painted the Grissom memorial certainly knew. If any of them cared or not is a different story.
It is not patriotism or anything like that. It is plain old decency. Leave stuff alone that is not yours. Have a little respect for the people the memorials are for.
Thu Jun 09, 2011 6:17 pm
muddyboots wrote:Nice straw man argument. Decency has nothing to do with children playing with chalk and everything to do with adults making choices. There is nothing indecent about a child playing at the memorials. If I were a dead vet as opposed to just a combat vet I would be thrilled to have children playing over my memorial. Far better than some stuffed shirt dumping a lod of flowers there once a year.
Thu Jun 09, 2011 6:26 pm
mustangdriver wrote:Guys, I by no means meant for this to become a nasty thread, just posting what happened to the Grissom Memorial.
Thu Jun 09, 2011 6:31 pm
Thu Jun 09, 2011 6:34 pm