muddyboots wrote:
yeah, she doesn't get it. But she's not a child. We were discussing children were we not? What does a twnety something taking a bath in the memorial pool have to do with kids playing with chalk?
My point was, and still is, disrespect is disrespect. I had no idea how old that girl was, I just remember hearing about it happening.
But that does not matter either way because disrespect starts at an early age and no matter how you market it, the majority of people are going to see anything like this as disprespectful. Swimming in the WWII memorial is just as disrespecful as kicking over headstones at a national cememtery or as disrespectful as painting on someones place of business.
In my mind it is no different than people tresspassing on other people's property for any reason: as was talked about at length in this thread:
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=40335Decency is fast going away and people have less and less respect for other people's memories, monuments and personal property as the days go by. Somebody believed they were free to do whatever they wanted to the Gus Grissom memorial because, like the tresspasser in the other thread, they thought the laws did not apply to them.
I am sure the kids that were drawing on the sidewalk with chalk had no idea that it was disrespectful and I am not quite ready to send them to the chair for it. But I am sure they know now. Their parents knew it was disrespectful. If they did not know, then they should have. The girl playing in the WWII memorial knew, or should have. And the people that spray painted the Grissom memorial certainly knew. If any of them cared or not is a different story.
It is not patriotism or anything like that. It is plain old decency. Leave stuff alone that is not yours. Have a little respect for the people the memorials are for.